Connected Competition: Inside a New Era of Collaborative Logistics

Connected Competition: Inside a New Era of Collaborative Logistics

From digital alliances to intermodal partnerships, collaboration is fast becoming a competitive edge in logistics and those who resist will pay in costs, carbon, and lost customers
Published on

The logistics industry has long thrived on competition - bigger fleets, faster routes, leaner costs. But a quiet revolution is underway. Major players that once battled for market share are now realizing they can’t win alone.

Third-party logistics providers, shipping lines, and rail authorities are starting to collaborate on a scale never seen before, sharing data, assets, and even customers to unlock new efficiency and resilience in a volatile global market.

This model promises to streamline global freight movement, reduce costs, and cut emissions. But it also challenges long-standing business practices, competitive instincts, and legacy systems that define the global logistics landscape.

The Case for Collaboration

At its best, logistics collaboration turns fragmented transport networks into cohesive, data-driven ecosystems. For shippers, this means fewer inefficiencies caused by redundant routes and idle assets. For carriers and logistics providers, it opens opportunities to optimize utilization and reduce waste.

1. Improved efficiency and asset utilization

Every year, billions are lost to empty miles. More than 25% of truck kilometers are still run empty, and ocean carriers report average container utilization rates of 65–70%. When 3PLs and transport operators share capacity and demand data in real time, these inefficiencies can shrink dramatically.

A standout example is the Digital Container Shipping Association (DCSA), formed by Maersk, MSC, Hapag-Lloyd, CMA CGM, and a host of others. These global shipping lines, traditionally fierce competitors, agreed on common digital standards to improve vessel scheduling, documentation, and port calls.

The Smart Road to Efficiency: AI-Driven Routing Slashes Logistics Costs

By collaborating on shared data formats and operational visibility, they’ve reduced port congestion and shortened cargo dwell times, especially across major European and Asian trade lanes.

2. End-to-end visibility

Digital platforms now make it possible for all parties in a supply chain to track and share shipment data securely. This integrated visibility benefits everyone: shippers can forecast better, carriers can manage fleets more intelligently, and port and rail authorities can plan for smoother cargo flows.

The European intermodal cooperation between DHL Freight and DB Cargo is giving good results. Through shared planning systems and synchronized rail–road operations, they’ve created high-frequency, door-to-door transport corridors linking key manufacturing hubs in Germany, Poland, and the Benelux region.

The partnership allows DHL to offer greener transport options while DB Cargo benefits from steady volumes. The collaboration has been credited with cutting transit times by up to 20% and CO₂ emissions by over 30% compared to traditional road-only transport.

3. Cost reduction through shared networks

Joint planning across modes of ocean, rail, and road creates economies of scale. By pooling infrastructure, consolidating shipments, and co-locating warehouses, logistics players can reduce total transport costs while maintaining service reliability.

For instance, the Port of Singapore’s digital Port Community System (PCS), managed by PSA International, brings together shipping lines, freight forwarders, trucking firms, and customs authorities, all on one platform.

Like Singapore, for many other major ports around the world, from Rotterdam to Jebel Ali the deployment of a PCS has resulted in standardised communications, faster cargo clearance, and optimised terminal operations. This ecosystem-driven approach allows thousands of logistics players to function as one coordinated system.

4. Sustainability and emissions reduction

Collaborative logistics also supports the global sustainability push. When modes are coordinated effectively, freight can shift from road to rail or sea thus reducing emissions per tonne-mile. Rail authorities can work directly with 3PLs to expand intermodal transport. Shared route planning can reduce fuel waste.

The Barriers to Integration

Despite these clear benefits, implementing true collaboration across global logistics stakeholders is difficult. The challenges lie not only in technology but also in trust, governance, and culture.

1. Competitive dynamics and data reluctance

3PLs, shipping lines, and trucking firms are often competitors as much as partners. Sharing data on capacity, customers, or pricing can feel like exposing one’s competitive edge. Without neutral intermediaries or trusted data-sharing frameworks, collaboration can stall.

A notable cautionary example is the “TradeLens” initiative by Maersk and IBM. Launched in 2018, TradeLens aimed to create a blockchain-based digital ecosystem for global shipping. While technically advanced, it struggled to attract wide participation.

Many carriers and ports were wary of a system perceived to be controlled by one shipping line. Despite signing on a few key players, TradeLens was discontinued in 2022, highlighting that collaboration must be built on neutrality and shared governance - not dominance by any single actor.

2. Technological fragmentation

Digital integration is another major hurdle. Many logistics operators still rely on legacy systems that don’t interface easily with others. Even where APIs exist, differences in data standards create friction. Building interoperable systems demands not only capital but also coordination - often across national borders and regulatory regimes.

3. Regulatory barriers

Across international borders railway authorities often face regulatory constraints that complicate coordination. Customs procedures, port rules, and varying environmental standards further slow integration. Even within unified regions like the EU, harmonization remains incomplete, limiting the scalability of intermodal logistics collaboration.

4. Power imbalances

Large shipping lines or global 3PLs frequently dominate negotiations, leaving smaller trucking or rail operators with little leverage. Successful collaboration requires fair value-sharing and transparent governance. Without that balance, partnerships risk becoming one-sided rather than mutually beneficial.

What Success Looks Like

True collaboration doesn’t mean merging companies - it means merging intentions. The successes of DCSA, PSA Singapore, and DHL–DB Cargo show that alignment is possible when stakeholders commit to shared digital standards, transparent data exchange, and equitable governance.

To scale these successes, the logistics sector must focus on neutral digital platforms, policy alignment, and shared sustainability goals. Governments and trade associations can accelerate progress by incentivizing intermodal cooperation and setting common data protocols.

Strategic Necessity

The future of global logistics depends on cooperation as much as competition. As supply chains grow more complex and sustainability pressures intensify, no single mode or company can operate effectively in isolation. Collaboration among 3PLs, shipping lines, trucking companies, and rail authorities is not merely a trend - it’s a strategic necessity.

Surely, this collaboration will demand significant cultural change and policy innovation, but the prize of higher efficiencies, lower emissions, and greater resilience, is impossible to ignore. Industry players who learn to collaborate, not just compete, will lead the next generation of successful global transport and logistics companies.

Read More: Insight - How Digitalisation is Giving Smaller Logistics Players Big-League Power

Related Stories

No stories found.
logo
Transport and Logistics ME
www.transportandlogisticsme.com